Work/2/5/Side quest

Juno reviews websites like a designer, mine included.

Six cards, one per question, from “Can people find you?” to “Do you look trustworthy?”

A finding from Juno’s example report: what is wrong now, and what to try instead

Juno’s summary for wernersdesigns.com on 21 October: 48 of 100, Poor

Juno’s summary for wernersdesigns.com on 23 October: 99 of 100, Excellent

Juno’s waiting page during an audit: “Which is looked up more?”, Christmas against Coffee — A game for the wait

Company: Self-employed
Role: Designer & developer
Year: 2026
Team: Solo

Brief

A small business can’t easily get a designer to review its website. Free SEO tools only check whether Google can read it. Juno gives owners that kind of review, with the fixes in plain words. It was also my test of how far one designer can take a real product alone.

Outcome

Juno is live at junoknows.design. I designed and built it in 4 days with Claude Code. It reviews a website against a rubric of 68 checks. My own site went from 48 to 99 over three rounds of fixes.

4Days to build

68Checks in the rubric

48→99My site’s score out of 100

My part

I designed and built Juno’s audit engine, scoring, report and website. I designed straight into code with Claude Code. The rubric is code too: every check has a question, a pass line, a weight and a source.

Built with

Claude Code
junoknows.design

Decisions

Key decisions.

1/3

No score without evidence

A finding without evidence never moves the score. Neither does a verdict Juno isn’t sure of. Both are set aside for a person to confirm. The overall score shows how much was checked. Where too little of an audit was checked, its tile says “Not checked yet” and shows no score.

Scores by audit on my site: UI 47, copy 75, accessibility 38 and SEO 70. UX and conversion say “Not checked yet”.

2/3

Two readers for every finding

The owner gets each finding in plain words, with the fix. That version has no code, colour codes or acronyms. Below it, a folded note gives their developer the exact selectors and values.

My site’s one finding left, analytics: the owner’s version with its fix, and the developer’s note open below

3/3

What to fix first

Each finding is ranked by how serious it is and how widely it shows. After the scores, the report picks the three that matter most, no more than two from one audit. When two findings matter equally, the quicker fix comes first.

“If you only do three things” from my site’s report: three numbered fixes, each with why it matters

More screens

Juno’s report for wernersdesigns.com on a phone — The report on a phone

The developer brief from a Juno report — The brief for a developer

Next / 3/5 Bandcamp